Stream Finance announced a loss of $93 million in user assets and is preparing for bankruptcy, impacting stablecoin lenders on lending protocols such as Morpho, Silo, and Euler. This article is based on an article by Thedefinvestor and compiled, translated, and written by Plain Language Blockchain .
(Previous context: After the xUSD stablecoin decoupled, the USDX pool also dried up .)
(Background information: Balancer: V2 pool suffered a vulnerability attack resulting in a loss of $128 million, V3 unaffected; experts criticize: audits of more than ten times were completely useless .)
![图片[1]-Stablecoin protocol Stream Finance collapses, impacting three major lending platforms.-OzABC](https://www.ozabc.com/wp-content/uploads/cover-image-stream-finance-collapse-affects-major-lending-platforms-800x533.webp)
Last week was a bad week for DeFi, and not just because of the market crash.
Last week:
- Balancer , a top DeFi protocol, was exploited, resulting in a loss of $128 million.
- Stream Finance , a protocol that primarily generates yield through stablecoins, announced the loss of $93 million in user assets and is preparing to declare bankruptcy.
- Moonwell lost $1 million in an attack.
- Peapods ‘ Pod LP TVL (Total Value Locked) dropped from $32 million to $0 due to liquidation.
So far, the most devastating loss has been to Stream Finance.
This is because it affects not only its depositors but also stablecoin lenders of some of the largest lending protocols in the space, including Morpho, Silo, and Euler.
In short, here’s what happened:
CBB, a prominent figure on Crypto Twitter, has begun advising people to withdraw their investments from Stream due to its lack of transparency.
![图片[2]-Stablecoin protocol Stream Finance collapses, impacting three major lending platforms.-OzABC](https://www.ozabc.com/wp-content/uploads/08b85ee002fbfb7864cdc7eca8b2aa54.png-1.jpeg)
Stream is reportedly running a “DeFi market-neutral strategy,” but its positions cannot be monitored, and its transparency page has been consistently listed as “coming soon.”
This triggered a bank run, with a large number of users attempting to withdraw funds simultaneously.
Stream Finance has suspended withdrawal processing because it recently lost a huge sum of user funds ($92 million) and was unable to process all withdrawal requests.
![图片[3]-Stablecoin protocol Stream Finance collapses, impacting three major lending platforms.-OzABC](https://www.ozabc.com/wp-content/uploads/1e293a179fab2b7e25cfa5e208036a44.png-1.jpeg)
This caused the price of its xUSD (Stream’s interest-bearing “stablecoin”) to collapse.
This already sounds terrible, but the story isn’t over yet.
A major problem is that xUSD is listed as collateral in currency markets such as Euler, Morpho, and Silo.
Worse still, Stream has been using its so-called stablecoin xUSD as collateral to borrow funds from the money market to execute its yield strategy.
With the xUSD price now crashing, many lenders who lent USDC/USDT to xUSD collateral on Euler, Morpho, and Silo are no longer able to withdraw their funds.
According to the DeFi User Alliance (YAM), at least $284 million in DeFi debt across various money markets is tied to Stream Finance!
Unfortunately, a large portion of this money may be unrecoverable.
As a result, many stablecoin lenders suffered heavy losses.
What can we learn from this?
I have been personally involved in the farming of DeFi protocols for the past 2-3 years.
However, following the recent events, I plan to re-evaluate my DeFi portfolio positions and become more risk-averse.
Yield farming can be very profitable. I’ve made some substantial profits from it over the past few years, but events like this can cause you to lose a significant amount of money.
I have a few suggestions:
Always verify the exact source of income.
Stream isn’t the only DeFi protocol claiming to generate yield through a “market-neutral strategy.” Be sure to look for transparency dashboards or proof-of-reserve reports, where you can clearly see that the team isn’t gambling with your assets.
Don’t blindly trust a protocol just because the team behind it seems good.
Consider whether the risk-reward ratio is good enough.
Some stablecoin protocols offer an annualized return (APR) of 5-7%. Others may offer over 10%. My advice is not to blindly deposit funds into protocols offering the highest yields without doing proper research.
If the strategy is not transparent, or the process of generating returns seems too risky, then it is not worth risking your money for a double-digit annual return.
Or if the returns are too low (e.g., an annualized rate of 4-5%), ask yourself if it’s worth it.
No smart contract is risk-free; we’ve even seen established applications like Balancer attacked. Is it worth risking everything for a low annualized return (APY)?
Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.
As a general rule, I never deposit more than 10% of my portfolio into a single dApp.
No matter how tempting the returns or airdrop opportunities may seem, the impact on my finances should a hacking attack occur.
In short, when building your investment portfolio, prioritize survival over making money.
It’s always better to be safe than to regret.
感谢您的支持
